Rangsiman Rome Demands Answers on 40M Bribe and 'Nai Cue' Case
Rangsiman Rome questions the 40 million baht bribery case and probes Pol. Lt. Gen. Tairong Phupan over why 'Nai Cue' remains untouched.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Rangsiman Rome leads a House committee meeting focusing on a 40 million baht bribery case.
- Pol. Lt. Gen. Tairong Phupan called to testify regarding 'Nai Cue', alleged manager of 4,000 gambling sites.
- Two main hypotheses raised over the police complaint filed by Chaiwatchanak Chidchob.
At 9:30 AM on August 6 at the Parliament House, Mr. Rangsiman Rome, a party-list MP from the People's Party and Chairman of the House Committee on Legal Affairs, Justice and Human Rights, gave an interview regarding the committee's agenda, which centers on tracking a 40 million baht bribery case involving Digital Economy and Society Minister Chaiwatchanak Chidchob.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
During today's session, Pol. Lt. Gen. Tairong Phupan, currently serving as Deputy Inspector General of the Royal Thai Police, is scheduled to provide information regarding the case. The hearing is expected to shed light on 'Nai Cue', an individual accused of managing 4,000 online gambling websites, who has yet to be summoned or face any legal charges to date.
Rangsiman further noted that while warrants have been issued for everyone involved except Nai Cue, public skepticism remains high regarding the underlying causes. He outlined two specific hypotheses concerning the complaint previously filed by Chaiwatchanak at the Crime Suppression Division.
Parliamentary oversight plays a critical role in maintaining institutional accountability, especially in high-profile corruption allegations involving political figures and law enforcement agencies. Legislative committees utilize their inquiry powers to demand transparency and prevent sensitive cases from stalling within investigative bodies.
The committee chairman detailed the two possibilities regarding the legal complaint:
- First: The complaint filed against Nai Cue might be a false accusation.
- Second: It is not a false complaint, but rather points to negligence or incompetence by the relevant law enforcement officers handling the case.
Rangsiman concluded that these loopholes explain why Nai Cue continues to live comfortably in Thailand without facing arrest warrants or legal proceedings, raising concerns that the matter might eventually fade away quietly within the National Anti-Corruption Commission.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment