Pakamon Denies People's Party Backs Section 112 Suits, Urges EC
People's Party spokesperson Pakamon Noonanan denies party encouragement of Section 112 lawsuits over Senate vote rigging clips, urging the EC on August 19.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- People's Party officially denies supporting public lawsuits under Section 112
- Points out flaws in Section 112 enforcement prone to political bullying
- Criticizes political groups using the law selectively against rivals
- Demands Election Commission expedite Senate rigging cases to the court
On August 19, Ms. Pakamon Noonanan, a party-list Member of Parliament and spokesperson for the People's Party, addressed accusations claiming her party instigated citizens to file defamation lawsuits under Article 112 of the Criminal Code. The controversy stemmed from leaked audio clips concerning alleged corruption in the Senate election process. She firmly stated that the party has never supported or promoted such legal actions among the general public.
The party spokesperson further elaborated on their stance regarding the law, acknowledging systemic issues in how Article 112 is currently enforced. Because the regulations allow any individual to file complaints against others, the statute faces a high risk of being exploited as a political instrument for targeted harassment. Furthermore, she noted that several provisions fail to align with recognized international legal standards.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Ms. Pakamon clarified that prior statements made by party leaders merely intended to question the double standards of certain political factions. These groups frequently weaponize the law to eliminate political opponents while remaining silent when similar incidents befall their own allies. She emphasized that this critique aims to highlight the distorted nature of judicial warfare in society rather than encouraging anyone to weaponize the law against others.
“You should expedite your duties by formally indicting all suspects involved in the Senate rigging network to the court and utilizing the judicial process to verify the facts, in order to restore public trust.”
This press conference highlights the People's Party's strategic communications to manage reputational risks in a delicate political climate, particularly concerning Article 112 which is frequently leveraged for ideological attacks. Simultaneously, directing intense pressure toward an independent body like the Election Commission serves as a political mechanism to force structural corruption cases into formal judicial proceedings, sustaining momentum for systemic reform demands.
Regarding the illicit use of names and affiliations heard within the controversial audio recordings, the party spokesperson characterized it as another wrongful tactic tied to the wider Senate election rigging conspiracy. She noted that these actions align directly with testimonies provided by multiple witnesses who have progressively stepped forward to expose the network and operational patterns to the public.
Given the comprehensive body of evidence currently circulating in public view and held directly by the Election Commission, Ms. Pakamon asserted that the regulatory agency must stop dragging its feet. She demanded that the commission exercise its statutory authority to formally refer all indicted individuals connected to the Senate vote-rigging scheme to the judicial system, allowing the courts to establish factual accuracy and reclaim public confidence.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment