King Prajadhipok Poll: Constitutional Court leads trust
King Prajadhipok's Institute poll shows 31.3% of Thais trust the Constitutional Court most, while the Election Commission trails at 3.8%.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- King Prajadhipok's Institute poll shows 31.3% trust Constitutional Court
- Election Commission ranks lowest in public trust with only 3.8%
- 51% of respondents want updates on cases and decision reasons
- 51.9% perceive the Election Commission as lacking political independence
King Prajadhipok's Institute has released a public opinion survey regarding the Constitutional Court and independent organizations in Thailand. The results indicate that 31.3% of respondents selected the Constitutional Court as the organization they trust the most, followed by 27.7% who were unsure or had no comment. Meanwhile, the Election Commission of Thailand received the lowest trust rating at just 3.8%. Other organizations included the National Human Rights Commission at 13.2%, the National Anti-Corruption Commission at 10.9%, the State Audit Office at 6.6%, and the Ombudsman at 6.5%.
Regional breakdowns show that the Constitutional Court received the highest proportion of votes in the North at 44.8%, the South at 37.5%, and the East at 29.6%. In Bangkok, the State Audit Office led with 28.9%, while the Northeast at 38.4% and the Central region at 33.5% saw the undecided group as the majority. In the South, the National Human Rights Commission closely followed at 34.7%.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Regarding the types of information citizens want these organizations to disclose, 32.8% requested updates on cases and complaints. This was followed by 18.2% wanting to know the reasoning behind rulings or decisions, 15.3% requesting budget spending and procurement details, 11.2% asking for decision-making criteria, 7.2% wanting accessible complaint channels, 5.2% seeking tangible achievements, 4.7% requesting conflict-of-interest prevention measures, and 3.9% wanting operational timelines. Combining the top two categories, 51.0% expressed a desire to know both case progress and ruling rationale.
This poll from King Prajadhipok's Institute highlights critical challenges for independent organizations in Thailand, particularly concerning transparency and public data accessibility. The dispersed trust scores and significant percentage of undecided respondents point to a clear communication gap that these entities must bridge to prove their operational effectiveness and accountability to the public.
When evaluating the Election Commission's operational efficiency, 23.7% rated its efficiency, expertise, speed, and cost-effectiveness at the highest "much to most" level, while 21.3% rated its ability to hold honest and fair elections similarly. However, looking at the "little to least" assessment, 51.9% felt the agency lacked independence from political interference, and 50.8% believed it lacked neutrality and fairness in judging election cases, presenting a major hurdle for the commission.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment