Pharadon addresses Ang Thong senator candidate phone call claim
Pharadon Pariyanont responds to claims about an Ang Thong senate candidate's phone call, stating he cannot recall due to a two-year gap.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Pharadon addresses reports of receiving a call from an Ang Thong senate candidate.
- He explains he cannot remember the specific call after a span of two years.
- Notes that handling hundreds to thousands of daily calls makes recall difficult.
- Rejects unverified allegations while welcoming legitimate public scrutiny.
Amid ongoing political discussions and scrutiny, Pharadon Pariyanont has publicly addressed recent claims regarding a phone call allegedly made by a senate candidate from Ang Thong province. When asked about the contact, he candidly admitted that he has no recollection of the specific interaction because a period of two years has already passed since that time.
Elaborating on the nature of his daily communications, Pharadon explained that receiving hundreds or even thousands of phone calls is a standard occurrence in his routine as a public figure. Managing such an enormous volume of incoming contacts on a regular basis makes it virtually impossible to retain the memory of every individual conversation from the distant past.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Regarding the broader context of the allegations, Pharadon pointed out that in the current political landscape, it has become common for individuals intent on political attacks to fabricate and distribute false data sets. He noted instances where his name was placed into tables and arbitrarily linked to various other individuals for the sole purpose of defamation, raising the fundamental question of who is truly behind these coordinated campaigns.
"I do not reject scrutiny, but I reject taking unproven allegations to judge a person's guilt."
Pharadon Pariyanont
The statement highlights a firm boundary regarding how political accountability should be handled. Pharadon emphasized that while he remains fully open to transparent investigations and oversight from relevant entities, he strongly objects to the practice of weaponizing unverified claims or raw data to prematurely damage someone's reputation or declare them at fault.
Pharadon's remarks shed light on the pervasive issue of information warfare within modern Thai politics, where raw data, contact logs, or unverified lists are frequently weaponized to create damaging narratives against political opponents. This tactic often surfaces during periods of heightened political tension or critical national investigations, creating significant challenges for public figures who must navigate both genuine oversight and politically motivated smear campaigns.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment