Suksornruay Blasts Opposition Over Old Allegations on Senate Conspiring
Suksornruay fires back at the opposition for recycling outdated and distorted information regarding alleged Senate selection collusion, while targeting MP Parit for being two years late.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Suksornruay criticizes opposition for reviving a dismissed 2-year-old case.
- Asserts her sister-in-law failed to pass the provincial round if rigging was real.
- Dares critics and iLaw to submit actual evidence to the Election Commission and DSI.
- Instructs legal team to review a current TV program for potential defamation.
Suksornruay addressed the public regarding her connection to Mrs. Supansa Wantaniyakul, confirming that residents throughout Amnat Charoen province are well aware she is her sister-in-law. She noted that her relative ran for a Senate seat within the women's group category but was eliminated during the provincial-level selection phase, failing to advance to the national round.
Furthermore, Suksornruay mentioned her husband, Pol. Col. Chatchanan Phonbut, arguing that if she genuinely possessed the ability and orchestrated such irregularities, she could have successfully secured positions for her family members. She stressed that bringing up these allegations now only serves to cause unwarranted damage and public misunderstanding.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Addressing whether she had ever been summoned for questioning, Suksornruay revealed that she previously received a formal notice as an accused individual from the 26th sub-committee. The document contained a list of roughly a hundred names without specifying exact points requiring defense, listing only general accusations numbered one through five. She responded in writing stating she committed no wrongdoing, while noting that the banquet investigation was concluded internally by the provincial Election Commission two years ago.
"As I mentioned, Mr. Parit is a bit late, taking two years to speak up and bringing forward information that has already been investigated and concluded. I do not need to say much because I believe that court rulings or EC conclusions on each matter will be made known, but they chose not to present the truth."
Suksornruay Sangkasri
When asked whether the Senate collusion scandal impacts the stability of the Bhumjaithai Party, Suksornruay firmly stated that it does not. She emphasized that the party has faced numerous similar situations and has grown accustomed to them, suggesting critics should focus on other matters instead. She also revealed that she has instructed her legal team to review the transcript of the TV program "Jaluek Thua Thai Inside Thailand" because it featured leading questions designed to incite public hatred and criticism, despite having court rulings and EC conclusions from two years ago.
Contextual Analysis: The allegations surrounding senate selection collusion remain a focal point of political debate in Thailand, particularly due to the complex multi-stage self-selection mechanism utilized for the upper house. Civil society organizations like iLaw have consistently scrutinized potential structural loopholes such as bloc voting and coordinated candidate registration. Consequently, when prominent political figures are linked to these processes, it frequently triggers intense legal sparring and disputes over accountability timelines handled by independent oversight bodies.
Regarding statements made by iLaw manager Yingcheep Atchanont, who declared readiness to prove his claims if officials explained the Senate collusion case, Suksornruay responded that it is entirely fine, adding that anyone possessing concrete data should submit it directly to the Election Commission and the Department of Special Investigation.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment