Phetcharat and Phuthita Criticize Mallika Over Mic Cut
MP Phetcharat Mai-chomphu and Phuthita criticized First Deputy House Speaker Mallika Jiraphanwanich for cutting off MPs' mics during the Clean Air Act debate on Sept 2, 2026.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- MPs Phetcharat and Phuthita criticized First Deputy Speaker Mallika Jiraphanwanich
- The criticism followed a sudden microphone cut off during the Clean Air Act debate
- MPs argued the action silenced representatives voicing severe PM 2.5 crisis concerns
- The debate raised issues regarding Senate amendments favoring industrial sectors
On September 2, 2026, Ms. Phetcharat Mai-chomphu, a Member of Parliament for Chiang Mai from the People's Party, alongside Ms. Phuthita, voiced strong disapproval regarding an incident in the House of Representatives. They directed their criticism at Ms. Mallika Jiraphanwanich, the First Deputy Speaker of the House, who pressed the button to cut off the microphone of an MP while they were actively debating the Clean Air Management Bill.
As an MP representing Chiang Mai—a region enduring severe and continuous PM 2.5 crises and air pollution—Ms. Phetcharat stated that citizens nationwide have long awaited this vital legislation. The ongoing parliamentary debate was intended to challenge key revisions previously made by the Senate, which critics argue tend to favor conglomerates, reduce penalties for the industrial sector, and diminish public participation.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Nevertheless, several MPs were abruptly cut off by the meeting's chair before finishing their arguments. This premature interruption sparked concerns over whether the actions hindered elected officials from properly executing their duties as mouthpieces for citizens grappling with environmental disasters.
"Air pollution is a crisis that has brought prolonged suffering to the public, and society is eagerly awaiting this legislation. The House of Representatives should serve as an open space for representatives to voice grievances and fully protect public interests, rather than rushing to cut off discussions and causing the people's voices to be overlooked."
Phetcharat Mai-chomphu
This microphone-cutting incident during the deliberation of the Clean Air Act highlights legislative friction between the House of Representatives and the Senate regarding checks and balances. Environmental laws intersecting with industrial interests often trigger intense debates, as lawmakers weigh economic growth against the long-term health impacts borne by local communities.
The People's Party MPs stressed that the parliament must remain an open platform for grassroots representatives to ensure that final legislative frameworks genuinely resolve the PM 2.5 crisis rather than prioritizing corporate benefits at the expense of public health.
Source: Khaosod Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment