MP Thanadet Explains Unrecorded Vote on Budget Bill
People's Party MP Thanadet Pengsuk clarifies his unrecorded vote on the 2027 budget bill, reaffirming his opposition stance and denying party-switching rumors.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- MP Thanadet clarifies unrecorded vote on the 2027 fiscal budget bill in parliament
- Attributes the issue to a voting system glitch and reports it to the People's Party
- Denies rumors of supporting the ruling coalition during sub-committee budget reviews
- Emphasizes commitment to party ideology, honor, and accountability to constituents
People's Party Member of Parliament Thanadet Pengsuk has addressed public concerns regarding his unrecorded vote during the parliamentary deliberation of the 2027 fiscal budget bill. He clarified that he was present and actively pressed the button to vote against the bill, but the electronic voting system failed to register his input. He noted that this technical malfunction was reported directly to the People's Party leadership.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
The MP emphasized that throughout the second reading of the budget bill across all sections, he consistently voted against the administration, leaving no reason or motive to alter his stance or abstain during the final vote. He also strongly refuted rumors suggesting he had previously voted in favor of the government coalition during sub-committee budget sessions, offering to make all meeting minutes public to verify the facts immediately.
Voting discrepancies and technical glitches in the Thai parliament's electronic system often draw public scrutiny, as individual votes reflect crucial political alignments between the ruling coalition and opposition parties. For major opposition factions like the People's Party, internal discipline and transparency regarding legislative votes are vital for maintaining public trust and holding the executive branch accountable.
Furthermore, Thanadet firmly dismissed speculation concerning a potential party switch or political bargaining. He reiterated that he remains steadfast in his political stance and has not engaged in any negotiations for political benefits.
"I was entrusted by the people to serve under the party and ideology of my choice, and I value this trust far more than any political position. If one day I can no longer uphold the ideology chosen by the people, I would rather return my seat to them than trade their trust for political floor-crossing. For me, this is a matter of honor, dignity, and responsibility to the public, and I will safeguard it."
Thanadet Pengsuk
Concluding his statement, Thanadet stressed that maintaining his honor, dignity, and duty to the citizens who elected him supersedes holding a seat in parliament. He affirmed that if he can no longer uphold those core principles, stepping down is preferable to trading public trust for a political realignment.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment