Sept 14 Senate collusion case is a crucial test for Thai democracy
Academics including Thongtong, Siripan, and Prajak warn that the September 14 decision on the Senate collusion case is a defining test for Thai democracy.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Thongtong warns that independent agencies tied to the Senate risk public trust
- Siripan criticizes the 2017 constitution for creating a flawed election oversight
- Prajak states that the September 14 ruling is a critical test for Thai democracy
In a recent academic forum on Thai politics, Prof. Special Thongtong Chandrasorn discussed the origins of the Election Commission (EC), recalling his role in drafting the 1940 constitution when the EC was first established. He likened the historical transition from Ministry of the Interior oversight to an independent agency as escaping a tiger only to encounter a crocodile, noting that true independence was never fully realized.
Prof. Special Thongtong further pointed out that independent agencies are currently intertwined with the Senate, and if the Senate fails to maintain neutrality, these institutions will inevitably suffer. In his view, the Courts of Justice—having no ties to the Senate—currently command the highest level of public confidence among all state institutions.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Meanwhile, Prof. Dr. Siripan Nogsuan Sawasdee argued that the 1997 constitution, which birthed the EC, was effectively dismantled by the 2017 constitution. She noted that the current EC and Senate lack a direct mandate from citizens, pointing to flaws in the Senate selection process and the EC delegating initial registration tasks back to the Ministry of the Interior, effectively merging the tiger and crocodile into a single powerful entity.
The recurring metaphor of escaping a tiger to meet a crocodile highlights ongoing structural concerns among Thai legal scholars regarding whether constitutional mechanisms can truly establish independent oversight free from political entanglements.
Prof. Dr. Siripan also addressed the EC's upcoming decision on September 14 regarding the Senate collusion case, stating that the public expects the EC to utilize its constitutional authority to let the judiciary make the final ruling. She emphasized the need for consistent legal application and transparent justifications for the commission's decisions.
"นี่เป็นความหละหลวมของ กกต. ที่ไม่มีระเบียบ เป็นแนวทางเดียวกัน ในการกำหนดคุณสมบัติ เสื้อของผู้สมัครตั้งแต่เริ่ม หรืออาจใช้คำว่าปล่อยให้มีช่องโหว่ทางกฎหมาย ปล่อยให้กลุ่มเครือข่ายทางการเมืองสามารถระดมหรือชักชวน ผู้สมัครจำนวนมาก กลายมาเป็นผู้สมัครพลีชีพ"
Prof. Dr. Siripan Nogsuan Sawasdee
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Prajak Kongkirati added that September 14 represents a critical crossroads not just for the Senate or the EC, but for the very survival and recovery of Thai democracy. He warned that core democratic pillars—including free and fair elections, robust checks and balances, and the rule of law—are currently weakening amid unresolved election controversies and legal actions against political dissidents.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment