Skip to main content

Anutin Supports BMA Transparency Ruling for State Agencies

Anutin Charnvirakul emphasizes transparency for all state agencies following the BMA data disclosure ruling, stating he conceals nothing.

AI-written
Inewgen
13 Sep 2026Source: Matichon Politics2 min read (0 views)
Share
Anutin Supports BMA Transparency Ruling for State Agencies

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • Anutin Charnvirakul has acknowledged the court order requiring the BMA to disclose information.
  • He emphasized that all government agencies must maintain transparency and follow the law.
  • He stated that personally, he discloses everything and conceals nothing from inquiries.
  • He warned agency executives to carefully review legal frameworks to avoid potential lawsuits.

Anutin Charnvirakul has shared his perspective regarding the official ruling ordering the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration to disclose specific information, stressing that transparency is a fundamental duty for every state agency to allow public accountability.

When asked whether this standard principle would be directly applied across the government administration, Anutin clarified that such practices are already in place and represent a core responsibility that every agency executive must handle diligently.

Thailand government building

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

"If anyone refuses to disclose information, they risk being sued, which is their own responsibility. We cannot force everything. Agency executives must study the law carefully."

Anutin Charnvirakul

Furthermore, Anutin reflected on his personal administrative approach, asserting firmly that he operates with complete transparency across all matters and is fully open to any requests for information without withholding anything.

The ongoing discourse surrounding government transparency and open data mandates highlights the evolving expectations of public accountability in modern governance. High-level political figures publicly endorsing judicial orders for information disclosure set a clear precedent, signaling that bureaucratic secrecy faces increasingly strict legal and societal scrutiny.

Source: Matichon Politics

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article