Wittaya warns EC over partial Senate collusion probe
Wittaya Kaewparadai warns the Election Commission that prosecuting only a partial Senate collusion risks Article 157 lawsuits.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Wittaya Kaewparadai issues a warning to the Election Commission.
- Partial prosecution of Senate election collusion poses legal risks.
- EC members could face charges under Criminal Code Article 157.
Wittaya Kaewparadai, a former key leader of the PDRC and former Member of Parliament, has publicly expressed his concerns and issued a strong warning to the Election Commission (EC) regarding their handling of the controversial Senate selection process, particularly concerning allegations of collusion in various areas across the country.
The core of his warning focuses on the possibility that the EC might decide to take legal action or prosecute only selected cases of alleged Senate election collusion. He cautioned that such a selective approach could backfire, damaging the organization's credibility and fueling public skepticism about potential double standards.
<
Photo by Alejandro Cartagena 🇲🇽🏳🌈 / Unsplash
Furthermore, the veteran politician highlighted the severe legal risks that EC commissioners themselves could face if they neglect their duties or selectively enforce the law against individuals involved in suspicious election collusion. He explicitly noted that such actions could lead to citizens or affected parties filing lawsuits against them under Section 157 of the Criminal Code for malfeasance in office.
Section 157 of the Thai Criminal Code serves as a crucial legal mechanism to hold state officials accountable. When officials fail to perform their mandatory duties or exercise their power dishonestly, they commit a criminal offense. In the context of the EC's mandate to ensure electoral integrity, selective prosecution creates a significant legal vulnerability that opens the door to potential misconduct charges.
The ongoing scrutiny over the current Senate selection represents a critical test for the EC to demonstrate absolute transparency and strict adherence to the rule of law, ensuring that no allegations of favoritism or deliberate omission of duty are left unaddressed.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment