Skip to main content

Some parents on benefits to get up to £4,500 for child starting apprenticeship

New government bursaries will replace Universal Credit payments lost when young family members start jobs or apprenticeships.

AI-written
Inewgen
29 Jul 2026Source: BBC Business3 min read (0 views)
Share
Some parents on benefits to get up to £4,500 for child starting apprenticeship

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • Eligible parents on benefits to receive up to £4,500 a year
  • Bursary replaces Universal Credit lost when children start apprenticeships
  • Funded by a £30m pot from the employer growth and skills levy
  • Aims to tackle the rising number of young people classified as Neet

Parents receiving welfare benefits will be given up to £4,500 a year to encourage their children to take up apprenticeships, according to government announcements. Under the new plans designed to guide young people into employment, families will be offered a financial bursary to offset Universal Credit payments that would otherwise be lost upon taking a job.

The payment is specifically designed to resolve situations where a small number of households face immediate income drops if their children begin apprenticeships. It is expected to help several thousand households currently experiencing weekly losses ranging between £17 and £330 depending on their personal circumstances. Funding for this £30m bursary comes directly from the growth and skills levy, a tax levied on employers whose annual wage bills exceed £3m.

young worker apprenticeship workplace uk

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Official reports highlighted that a single parent caring for a disabled child could lose up to £340 per week in benefits if that child starts an apprenticeship, an amount that surpasses the expected apprenticeship salary of £258 per week. Because apprenticeship schemes are legally classified as paid employment, household benefit payments are automatically reduced. Committees have argued that this framework severely undermines government initiatives to reduce the tally of young individuals not in education, employment, or training (Neet).

£4,500Maximum annual bursary for parents
£30mFunding pot from employer skills levy
1,000,000+Young people aged 16-24 currently Neet

In a recent publication, former Health Secretary Alan Milburn cautioned that one out of every six young people could become Neet within the next five years unless immediate interventions are implemented. Government statistics indicate that over a million individuals aged 16 to 24 currently fall into this category. Officials noted that the newly introduced bursary will dismantle existing barriers, enabling youths to effectively earn and learn simultaneously.

Never miss the latest news?

Subscribe to get news summaries by email - not often enough to be annoying.

โฆษณา

"By providing bursaries to those who need them most and fully funding apprenticeship training, we are making sure cost is not the reason someone misses out."

Pat McFadden

This policy adjustment addresses a long-standing structural flaw where welfare rules inadvertently penalize low-income families whose children attempt to enter the workforce through vocational routes. By utilizing employer-funded levies to bridge the gap left by reduced Universal Credit, the policy attempts to harmonize social safety nets with labor market entry requirements, minimizing financial disincentives for underprivileged households.

This initiative forms a core component of a broader support framework for apprenticeships, encompassing specialized training funds for individuals under 25 alongside extra incentives for corporate employers hiring apprentices. Prime Minister Andy Burnham emphasized his total commitment to lowering Neet statistics, recently outlining strategic policies aimed at achieving equilibrium between academic instruction and technical vocational skills across the education infrastructure.

Source: BBC Business

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article