Skip to main content

People's Party MP Urges Anutin to Clarify EEC Expansion

Narumas, an MP from the People's Party, demands Anutin clarify the EEC expansion to Prachinburi after contradictory statements from officials.

AI-written
Inewgen
07 Nov 2026Source: Matichon Politics2 min read (0 views)
Share
People's Party MP Urges Anutin to Clarify EEC Expansion

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • People's Party MP demands Prime Minister Anutin clarify the Eastern Economic Corridor expansion
  • Confusion arose locally after the NESDC secretary-general made statements contradicting the government
  • Calls for the Prime Minister to officially sign and finalize the policy to reassure local residents

Narumas, a Member of Parliament from the People's Party, has stepped forward to demand that Anutin Charnvirakul provide a clear explanation regarding reports of expanding the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) into Prachinburi province, noting that local residents are experiencing widespread confusion.

This uncertainty stems from recent remarks made by the secretary-general of the Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC), which appeared to conflict with the government's previously stated policies and direction.

Thailand government building exterior no logo

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

The Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) project is a major infrastructure and industrial initiative aimed at boosting targeted investments, yet it frequently raises local concerns regarding environmental impacts and land use rights. Discrepancies in communication between high-ranking administrative officials and policymakers often highlight coordination challenges within the government apparatus.

Consequently, the opposition MP has urged the Prime Minister to urgently verify the facts and issue an official signed directive to definitively state whether the EEC will be expanded to Prachinburi, thereby putting an end to public anxiety and policy ambiguity.

Source: Matichon Politics

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article