Tom Ratchaneekorn Speaks Out After Court Orders 7.7 Million Baht Compensation, Ending 3 Years as a Social Defendant
Thai actress Tom Ratchaneekorn shares her relief after the court orders Pin Leoluck to pay 7.7 million baht, concluding a stressful three-year legal battle.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- The court orders Pin Leoluck to pay 7.7 million baht in damages to Tom Ratchaneekorn.
- Tom holds a press conference expressing immense relief after spending three years as a target of social criticism.
- Her lawyer attributes the legal victory to factual evidence and medical burden of proof under consumer law.
- The actress continues physical therapy for ongoing physical discomfort that may affect her for life.
A major entertainment news story unfolded as well-known Thai actress Tom Ratchaneekorn had her lawyer represent her to hear the court judgment before holding a press conference to express her relief. The court officially ordered Pin Leoluck to pay 7.7 million baht in compensation, bringing a definitive closure to a dispute that had lasted for three whole years.
Tom Ratchaneekorn revealed that during the past three years, she suffered greatly as a social defendant, facing harsh online criticism and painful labels while wearing a face mask in public out of insecurity. Winning this lawsuit felt like a profound release, allowing her to feel like a normal person again while expressing deep gratitude for the justice delivered through concrete facts and evidence.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Addressing the initial claim of 50 million baht, the actress explained that the figure was estimated based on career impacts and damage to her reputation, though she understood that the court would determine a realistic amount. She added that her ongoing physical injuries from medical procedures still cause severe discomfort, preventing her from opening her mouth fully and triggering eye socket and temple pain that requires continuous physical therapy for the rest of her life.
"The first feeling upon winning the case is that we fought for three years, serving as a social defendant for three years when people did not know the deeper details or what the reality truly was."
Tom Ratchaneekorn
Her defense attorney elaborated on the legal strategy, stating that the victory stemmed from presenting strict facts under consumer protection laws, where the burden of proof rests on the medical practitioner to demonstrate that no wrongful violation occurred. The court initially found negligence on the part of the doctor after reviewing medical certificates and conducting thorough witness examinations spanning three to four full days. The lawyer expressed absolute confidence, noting no fear regarding potential appeals or counter-suits since all actions were solidly backed by evidence.
This high-profile case highlights significant aspects of consumer protection law regarding aesthetic medical treatments, where the legal burden of proof often shifts to healthcare providers to demonstrate standard compliance and lack of negligence. It also illustrates the profound psychological toll public figures face from social media scrutiny before judicial processes reach a final conclusion.
Source: Thairath Entertainment
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment