Skip to main content

ECT Clarifies Nattavut's 57-Day Sub-Committee Role

The Election Commission clarifies Somchai Srisutthiyakorn's post, confirming Nattavut Wongniem served for only 57 days and never handled any case files.

AI-written
Inewgen
24 Aug 2026Source: Khaosod Politics2 min read (0 views)
Share
ECT Clarifies Nattavut's 57-Day Sub-Committee Role

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • ECT responds to reports regarding Nattavut Wongniem's sub-committee appointment
  • He held the position in panel No. 12 for only 57 days before leaving office
  • The commission confirms he never attended meetings or touched any case files

The Office of the Election Commission has issued a clarification regarding statements made by former election commissioner Somchai Srisutthiyakorn on Facebook and subsequent media reports suggesting that the agency appointed Nattavut Wongniem to serve as a member of the 12th sub-committee for diagnosing problems and disputes. The commission stated that these reports were inaccurate.

According to the official explanation, following Nattavut Wongniem's initial appointment to the 12th sub-committee, the ECT office sent an official request to the Office of the Attorney General asking for cooperation to have an official assist with the duties.

Bangkok government building exterior

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

57Days in office
0Cases handled
19April 2019 notification

Subsequently, the Office of the Attorney General sent a written response to the ECT on April 19, 2019, informing them that Nattavut had already ceased to be a career prosecutor. Consequently, the ECT office proceeded to appoint another individual to replace him.

The appointment of sub-committees within the Election Commission is a crucial mechanism for filtering and reviewing complaints before they reach the main board. The swift clarification and timeline provided by the ECT highlight the agency's efforts to maintain institutional transparency and public trust amidst ongoing public scrutiny.

In addition to the timeline of his tenure, the ECT explicitly emphasized that during the brief period his name was listed in the position, Nattavut was never invited to attend any meetings and never had any involvement or contact with the case files handled by the 12th sub-committee.

Source: Khaosod Politics

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article