Akaradech defends PM, slams People's Party over Senate case
Akaradech claims the People's Party raised the Senate collusion case after losing the February 2026 election, calling it a political game to discredit the government.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Akaradech defended the Prime Minister regarding the controversial Senate collusion case.
- He noted the People's Party brought up the issue only after losing the February 2026 election.
- He stated that answering EC matters could risk interfering with the justice system.
- The move is viewed as a political strategy aimed at discrediting the current administration.
Akaradech has stepped forward to defend the Prime Minister against persistent questioning by the opposition People's Party regarding the ongoing Senate collusion case. He argued that the situation is unmistakably a political maneuver rather than a genuine oversight effort, pointing out that the allegations surfaced long before Anutin Charnvirakul was initially voted in as Prime Minister.
Despite the existence of these allegations prior to the leadership vote, the People's Party chose not to raise the matter as a significant political issue at the time. It was only after suffering a defeat in the general election held in February 2026 that the opposition faction brought the Senate case back into the spotlight to target the ruling government.

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
“If you ask why they are bringing this up now when the issue already existed before, I believe it is hard to avoid the perception that this is a political move aimed at discrediting the current government.”
Akaradech
Akaradech further emphasized that if the Prime Minister were to comment or respond to matters that legally fall under the jurisdiction of the Election Commission (EC), it could easily be misconstrued as an intervention in the judicial process. He advised the opposition that a no-confidence debate should strictly focus on administrative governance and government performance rather than pressuring the premier over independent agency proceedings.
Political analysts note that utilizing independent agency cases to pressure national leaders is a common tactic to rally public sentiment rather than debate policy substance. Meanwhile, the government continues to rely on constitutional boundaries to deflect pressure on matters outside its direct authority.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment