Poo Manthana & Noom Kanchai Mediation Fails, Trial Continues
Poo Manthana and her lawyer spoke out after court mediation with Noom Kanchai failed over mismatched terms, confirming trial proceedings are underway.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Mediation between Poo Manthana and Noom Kanchai in court failed due to differing conditions.
- The court proceeded with witness examinations, hearing two plaintiff witnesses on the first day.
- Defense counsel noted that settlement negotiations remain possible anytime before the final verdict.
- Legal representatives advised Poo Manthana to speak less publicly to prevent miscommunication.
The legal dispute between well-known actress Poo Manthana and prominent TV host Noom Kanchai has reached a new stage as both parties appeared in court for a scheduled session. Following court policy, an initial mediation session was arranged in the morning, but discussions broke down as the proposed terms and conditions from both sides failed to align, leading to the cancellation of the proposed terms and the immediate commencement of witness examinations.
Poo Manthana's lawyer spoke to reporters regarding the court proceedings, stating that two plaintiff witnesses were examined during the first session. The schedule indicates that the plaintiff has two more witnesses to present, while the defense has prepared three witnesses for the following day. When asked about the specific proportion of terms that caused the disagreement, the lawyer declined to comment, citing that the details are part of the ongoing court proceedings.
Court-mandated mediation is a standard legal procedure designed to encourage disputing parties to reach an amicable settlement without requiring a full judicial trial and final verdict. If mediation fails, the litigation process naturally advances to witness testimony and cross-examination. The legal principle that parties can settle at any stage prior to the judge's final ruling highlights the flexibility retained by litigants to resolve conflicts independently.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Regarding concerns over evidence and testimony, the defense lawyer described it as a normal part of any courtroom trial involving cross-examination and factual scrutiny. The legal team also explained the strategy behind advising Poo Manthana to keep her public statements to a minimum, noting that past communication mishaps prompted them to suggest caution to prevent new conflicts or unintended references to third parties.
Meanwhile, Poo Manthana stated that she sat quietly and listened to the plaintiff's witnesses during the court session. She also addressed news reports regarding a major television program's Facebook page, expressing her perspective that certain media coverage had distorted the actual facts.
Source: Thairath Entertainment
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment