Skip to main content

Karndee Launches Petition to Halt TH-AI Passport Project Over 1.6B Budget

Democrat Party MP campaigns against the TH-AI Passport project, criticizing its multibillion-baht budget and inferior quality compared to free alternatives.

AI-written
Inewgen
29 Jul 2026Source: Matichon Politics4 min read (0 views)Last updated 04 Aug 2026
Share
Karndee Launches Petition to Halt TH-AI Passport Project Over 1.6B Budget

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • MP Karndee Leopairut initiates a public petition to halt the TH-AI Passport project.
  • The project costs over 1.62 billion baht but is criticized for being inferior to free tools.
  • Campaign highlights procedural corruption as an unacceptable standard for public spending.
  • The movement is spearheaded by independent Thai tech professionals via Stopaipass.

On July 29, Mrs. Karndee Leopairut, a party-list Member of Parliament and deputy leader of the Democrat Party, published a Facebook post urging citizens to sign a public campaign calling for the termination of the TH-AI Passport project. The controversial project allocates a budget exceeding 1.6 billion baht, yet critics argue its capabilities fall short of existing free software. She also expressed gratitude toward friends and supporters who shared links and information, giving her stronger momentum to pursue the investigation.

The campaign messaging shared by Mrs. Karndee encourages the public to support her efforts in questioning and scrutinizing the TH-AI Passport initiative to ensure that the 1.621 billion baht in taxpayer money is spent transparently, efficiently, and for genuine public benefit. The campaign noted that she stands as the sole politician persistently tracking this matter, while promoting hashtags centered on transparent auditing and stopping wasteful budget allocation through the Stopaipass website.

1.62B THBTH-AI Passport Project Budget
digital passport application software interface

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Meanwhile, reporters noted that this campaign was not initiated by any political party, but rather originated from a network of tech professionals in Thailand who operate independently without affiliation to political parties or funding from corporate entities. The campaign website clearly outlines its stance against allowing procedural corruption to become an acceptable national standard, pointing out that while every procedural step might be legally compliant, the lack of performance metrics remains deeply concerning.

Procedural corruption represents a complex systemic challenge within public administration, where projects strictly follow bureaucratic procurement rules and secure legal contractors, yet lack tangible key performance indicators (KPIs) or accountability mechanisms. This creates a critical debate over whether legal compliance alone is sufficient justification for committing billions of baht in public funds without demonstrable value for citizens.

Never miss the latest news?

Subscribe to get news summaries by email - not often enough to be annoying.

โฆษณา

The campaign website further elaborated that the core issue is not about rule violations, but rather the exploitation of bureaucratic regulations as a shield, given the absence of predetermined performance metrics or clear answers regarding the country's return on investment. It stresses that compliance with regulations does not automatically equate to correctness or true cost-effectiveness for the public.

We are not asking to review just a single project; we reject a standard that allows billions of baht in tax money to pass through without answering basic questions of who benefits, how it is measured, and whether it is open to public scrutiny.

Thai Tech Professionals and Karndee Leopairut

Furthermore, the campaign organizers firmly stated their refusal to accept billion-baht budget approvals lacking pre-announced indicators or vague agency-based disbursements. They are gathering public signatures to formally submit demands to the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society, urging them to terminate the project immediately.

Source: Matichon Politics

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article