Skip to main content

Meta disputes claim that Muse read private messages

Meta denies allegations that its AI app Muse accessed private messages without permission, while consumer trust remains strained by past data scandals.

AI-written
Inewgen
01 Oct 2026Source: TechCrunch3 min read (0 views)
Share
Meta disputes claim that Muse read private messages

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • Meta has formally disputed claims that its AI application Muse read user private messages without consent.
  • Users must explicitly grant Full Disk Access via macOS Settings, which triggers a complete app restart.
  • Ongoing public skepticism persists due to the tech giant's historical mishandling of consumer data.
  • Content creator Matt Robb reported a separate incident where Muse mistakenly exposed his home address.

A major controversy has stirred in the tech community as Meta pushes back against serious allegations claiming that its AI app, Muse, read user private messages without proper authorization. Despite the company's firm denials, a significant portion of consumers remains highly suspicious regarding the tech giant's data practices.

This widespread distrust is hardly surprising given the company's lengthy history of mishandling consumer data, which has repeatedly resulted in lawsuits, FTC violations, and hefty fines. Just days prior, a New Mexico jury determined that the company misled users about its data handling practices in a legal battle stemming from the 2018 Cambridge Analytica data breach scandal.

From a competitive standpoint in the consumer AI market, user trust will likely serve as the ultimate deciding factor for long-term success. While the Muse app currently maintains its top position on the App Store, Meta's hard-earned reputation could suffer irreversible damage if similar reports continue to surface, regardless of their validity. Industry observers suggest that direct engagement with journalists to thoroughly investigate the root cause would be far more effective than flat denials.

macOS settings computer workspace office desk

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Regarding the app's security architecture, Singleton detailed the stringent steps required for the software to interact with system messages:

Never miss the latest news?

Subscribe to get news summaries by email - not often enough to be annoying.

โฆษณา

  • Users must explicitly choose to grant Full Disk Access within the system settings.
  • The action invokes the macOS Settings user interface, requiring a secondary manual confirmation.
  • Completing this action triggers a full restart of the Muse application.

Because of these rigorous safeguards, Singleton argued that such an intrusion could not happen accidentally without the user's explicit knowledge. He pointed toward Meta's official documentation regarding Muse's security architecture and bug bounty program to reinforce his claims that Aten's reported scenario was technically impossible.

"What Aten said happened did not and could not have happened."

Singleton

Nevertheless, this incident may not be an isolated event for the AI assistant. YouTuber Matt Robb recently reported that Muse severely mishandled a task involving items he was selling on Facebook Marketplace, resulting in his home address being shared and a buyer showing up unexpectedly while he was away. Singleton has indicated that the company is actively investigating this particular mishap on Threads, suggesting acknowledgement that this specific issue may indeed stem from a company error.

Source: TechCrunch

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article