Skip to main content

The job interview question you do not have to answer

Explore why salary history questions are controversial in UK job interviews, workers' legal rights, and expert advice from Acas and Fawcett Society.

AI-written
Inewgen
05 Oct 2026Source: BBC Business3 min read (0 views)
Share
The job interview question you do not have to answer

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • Job applicants in the UK are under no legal obligation to disclose their current salary.
  • EU rules will ban salary history questions, but the UK currently lacks similar cabinet office plans.
  • Fawcett Society warns the practice perpetuates historic pay gaps linked to gender, race, and disability.
  • Experts advise focusing on personal skills, delivered value, and market rates instead of past pay.

Preparing thoroughly for a job interview is standard practice, yet one persistent question continues to cause discomfort for many candidates. While employers in the UK operate within their legal rights when asking applicants about their current salary, individuals attending interviews are under no obligation whatsoever to provide an answer.

Across international jurisdictions, new rules are rolling out within the European Union to officially ban employers from inquiring about an applicant's salary history. Meanwhile, Cabinet Office plans in the UK have not adopted a similar prohibition, focusing instead on encouraging employers to publish transparent salary information directly inside job advertisements.

Louise Rudd, a senior adviser at the workplace advice and conciliation service Acas, notes that no current regulations prevent employers from asking interviewees about their existing salary or future earnings expectations. She explains that employers wishing to gather this data should ask identical questions to every applicant to guarantee fair treatment across the board.

"Candidates can focus on showcasing the value they bring, the benefits that matter most to them and to go to the interview knowing the market rate for the role."

Shazia Ejaz, Recruitment and Employment Confederation

A campaign carrying the hashtag #EndSalaryHistory was launched several years ago to urge companies to stop questioning new hires regarding their previous compensation. The Fawcett Society, a prominent campaigner for women and gender equality, argued that asking about past pay risks sustaining historic, unfair pay disparities driven by inequalities tied to gender, race, and disability.

Never miss the latest news?

Subscribe to get news summaries by email - not often enough to be annoying.

โฆษณา

Tying future compensation directly to past earnings often institutionalizes historical biases, as marginalized applicants may enter the workforce with depressed starting salaries. Relying on historical baselines prevents true merit-based pay, making regulatory shifts away from salary history inquiries an essential step toward fairer employment practices.

The Recruitment and Employment Confederation supported the push, encouraging recruiters to drop the inquiry altogether. Shazia Ejaz, director of campaigns at the REC, suggests that jobseekers should approach monetary questions with realism and confidence, emphasizing their unique contributions, desired benefits, and thorough research into current market rates.

Source: BBC Business

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article