Nirat Dismisses Ex-Interior Permanent Secretary's Conflict Remarks
Nirat Pongsitthaworn dismisses controversial remarks by a former Interior Ministry permanent secretary over exam corruption, stating ancestors never taught abuse.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Nirat ignores controversial remarks from former MOI official
- Dispute centers on allegations of exam corruption
- Emphasizes that ministry traditions discourage verbal attacks
Senior Interior Ministry figure Nirat Pongsitthaworn has firmly addressed recent remarks made by a former permanent secretary regarding exam corruption allegations, stating that he refuses to give any value or attention to statements aimed at stoking division within the institution.
The ongoing tension stems from intense criticism and accusations regarding alleged irregularities and cheating in civil service examinations within the Ministry of the Interior, which has drawn widespread public attention and reactions from both active and retired high-ranking officials.
The friction between current representatives and retired senior bureaucrats in the Ministry of Interior highlights underlying tensions regarding administrative transparency and institutional legacy. Public rebuttals of this nature often underscore efforts by current leadership to defend the reputation and integrity of the ministry against criticisms from former influential figures.
Nirat further stressed that the core organizational culture of the Ministry of the Interior, passed down through generations by founding figures and predecessors, has never promoted or condoned using harsh language or attacking others publicly.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
This firm stance serves as a signal for all involved parties to refocus on their official duties and public service responsibilities rather than engaging in politically charged verbal spats that could undermine public trust in the ministry.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment