Skip to main content

Zack Polanski refuses to overturn Green Party Zionism motion

Green Party leader Zack Polanski insists he will not overturn a motion declaring Zionism racist, despite fierce backlash from the government and Jewish campaigners.

AI-written
Inewgen
18 Oct 2026Source: BBC Politics3 min read (0 views)
Share
Zack Polanski refuses to overturn Green Party Zionism motion

Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event

Font size
  • Zack Polanski confirms he will not overturn the Green Party's motion declaring Zionism racist.
  • The motion passed with 1,022 votes to 813 out of 230,000 total party members.
  • The decision sparked severe backlash and overshadowed Polanski's Holborn and St Pancras by-election campaign.
  • Polanski states he aims to amend it in the future but respects the democratic will of members until 2028.

Zack Polanski has stated that he will not overturn a motion passed by Green Party members which declared Zionism to be racist. Speaking on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, the party leader explained that while he would prefer to amend the motion, it will remain official party policy until 2028, and he denied that the decision was controversial.

The motion deeply divided the party and triggered a major backlash from Members of Parliament, Jewish campaigners, the government, and the European Green movement. The fallout overshadowed the final days of Polanski's campaign in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election, where he finished second behind Labour, posing a significant threat to his ongoing leadership.

1,022Votes in favour of the motion
813Votes against the motion
230,000Total party membership

Polanski previously faced criticism for abstaining from the vote on the motion, which ultimately passed with 1,022 votes to 813—representing only a small fraction of the party's 230,000 members. When asked if he would step in as leader to overturn the decision, Polanski maintained that he would not attempt to repeal it, though he hopes to amend it at the earliest opportunity to shift away from a single-state framework toward an outcome decided by Israelis and Palestinians themselves.

"I think if members have made a decision, then I respect the democratic will of our members."

Zack Polanski

When Kuenssberg pressed him on whether he would alter party rules in his capacity as leader, Polanski emphasized his respect for internal democracy, noting that he had previously stated he would not have supported the original motion without amendments. Green MPs, including Ellie Chowns, have since called for a review of the party's member-led decision-making procedures due to the extremely low voter turnout.

Never miss the latest news?

Subscribe to get news summaries by email - not often enough to be annoying.

โฆษณา

The controversy surrounding the Zionism motion highlights the inherent governance challenges faced by contemporary political parties with grassroots, member-led decision-making structures. When significant policy shifts are enacted by a small fraction of the total membership, party leadership often finds itself caught between honoring internal democratic mandates and managing broader national public relations and coalition relationships.

Meanwhile, the equality watchdog has written to the Greens over the motion, and Labour is reportedly moving to break ties with Green council groups backing the policy, underscoring the wider political ramifications of the vote.

Source: BBC Politics

Comments

Leave a Comment
0/2000

Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article