Democrat Party criticizes fuel tax cuts on E20 and B20
Trirat Sirichanthrapas from the Democrat Party criticized the 3-month E20-B20 tax cut on Oct 27, 2026, urging tax reductions on diesel B7 and Gasohol 91-95 instead.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Trirat Sirichanthrapas criticized the government's tax cut on E20 and B20 fuels as ineffective.
- Noted that B20 usage stands at 3 million liters/day and E20 at 6.5 million liters/day.
- Urged the cabinet to cut taxes on diesel B7 and Gasohol 91-95 to genuinely lower living costs.
On October 27, 2026, at the Democrat Party headquarters, Mr. Trirat Sirichanthrapas, a member of the party's energy economic team, held a press conference addressing the cabinet's recent resolution to reduce excise taxes on E20 and B20 fuels for a period of three months, arguing that the measure fails to adequately address the public's rising cost of living.
Trirat pointed out that targeting these specific fuel types misses the mark because their consumption volumes are relatively low compared to the primary fuels heavily relied upon by citizens and business sectors for daily transport and operations.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Current statistics show that B20 consumption is hovering around 3 million liters per day, while E20 usage registers at approximately 6.5 million liters daily—figures that pale in comparison to mainstream fossil fuels driving the broader economy.
"The tax reduction on E20 and B20 fuels does not fully meet the objective of lowering living costs because both fuel types have low consumption volumes."
Trirat Sirichanthrapas
Consequently, the Democrat Party has urged the administration to redirect its fiscal measures toward fuels with much higher usage rates, specifically high-speed diesel B7, which serves as the lifeblood of logistics, agriculture, and manufacturing sectors, alongside Gasohol 91 and 95 utilized by most private vehicle owners.
Energy tax policy decisions typically require balancing incentives for alternative eco-friendly fuels like E20 and B20 against immediate relief for transport and household expenses. Pushing to shift tax cuts toward diesel B7 and conventional gasohol highlights an ongoing debate over whether targeted environmental subsidies or broad-based consumer cost-relief should take priority during economic strains.
Source: Khaosod Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment