Natthapong: Gamnan Mano Protest Reflects Blue Regime
Speaking at the Thai parliament on Nov 9, 2026, People's Party leader Natthapong Ruangpanyawut warned that the protest highlights a political crisis.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Natthapong Ruangpanyawut stated the Gamnan Mano protest reflects a political crisis
- Accused the government of centralizing power and neglecting public hardships
- Voiced deep concern over the platform bill initiated by the Bhumjaithai Party
- Warned that strict control measures could harm Thai national business operators
On November 9, 2026, at the Sappaya-Sapasathan Thai Parliament Bangkok, Mr. Natthapong Ruangpanyawut, a party-list MP and leader of the People's Party, gave an interview addressing the escalating political tension. He focused particularly on the protest led by Mr. Mano Kruakaew, leader of the Front for the Revolution of the People to Protect the Land, who planned to maintain a rally site near the Government House until the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Natthapong urged the public to examine the broader picture, pointing out that his party has consistently highlighted how the current administration fails to place citizens at the core of its governance. He characterized this systemic issue as a manifestation of a concentrated political network controlling multiple branches of the state.
Photo by topcools tee / Unsplash
The opposition leader elaborated that this administration utilizes power across the executive branch, the legislature, and through attempts to influence independent agencies. Ultimately, these maneuvers serve primarily to safeguard the regime's own authority and interests rather than addressing the severe daily struggles faced by ordinary Thai citizens.
The term 'blue regime' used by the opposition leader is a strategic political reference describing a dominant party network that consolidates influence across local administrations, legislative bodies, and key ministries. Critics often argue that such deep-rooted networks weaken traditional checks and balances, making it challenging for minority parties and independent bodies to hold the administration accountable effectively.
Beyond the street protests, Natthapong expressed serious apprehensions regarding the digital platform draft law proposed by the Bhumjaithai Party. He cautioned that the true objective of this legislation leans heavily toward state control rather than genuine protection, which could inadvertently undermine domestic entrepreneurs and local business entities operating within Thailand.
Source: Khaosod Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment