Democrat Party Criticizes DEPA Over TOR Process and TH-AI Passport Risk
Democrat Party criticizes DEPA for drafting and approving its own TOR, warning that the TH-AI Passport project could face cancellation.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Democrat Party criticizes DEPA for drafting and approving its own TOR
- The action allegedly violates procurement regulations and integrity pacts
- Concerns raised that the TH-AI Passport project could become void
- Urgent calls made for independent bodies to investigate transparency
Political tension has risen as a representative from the Democrat Party strongly criticized the Digital Economy Promotion Agency (DEPA) regarding procurement procedures for a major government initiative, pointing out significant transparency concerns within the agency.
The core issue centers on DEPA allegedly drafting the Terms of Reference (TOR) and subsequently approving the project itself. Such practices raise serious questions regarding compliance with official regulations and integrity pacts established to ensure fair governance.
When a single agency both drafts the TOR and approves the project, it creates a governance conflict of interest. The TOR defines project requirements and vendor qualifications, and handling both stages internally risks compromising fair competition and public accountability in government procurement.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
The primary concern moving forward is the potential impact on the TH-AI Passport project. If the preliminary procurement process is found to be legally flawed or non-compliant, the entire initiative risks being declared void, causing substantial financial and operational setbacks.
Consequently, representatives from the Democrat Party have urged relevant oversight authorities and independent watchdog agencies to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter to ensure accountability and protect public interest.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment