Natthaphong Responds to Glatham Opposition Whip Removal
People's Party leader Natthaphong Ruangpanyawut clarifies the removal of the Glatham Party from the opposition whip, insisting proper coordination was made on Sept 23, 2026.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Natthaphong states any party outside the coalition naturally acts as opposition.
- He insists the People's Party coordinated with the Glatham Party beforehand.
- Uncertainty remains regarding Glatham's stance on a future no-confidence vote.
At 09:30 AM on September 23, 2026, at the Thai Parliament, Mr. Natthaphong Ruangpanyawut, list-MP and leader of the People's Party, gave an interview addressing the recent adjustment removing the Glatham Party from the opposition whip committee, firmly denying accusations of political discourtesy.
Natthaphong explained that within the framework of the parliamentary system, any political party not holding coalition status inherently functions as the opposition. The primary objective is to ensure robust and full-scale scrutiny of the government's administration for the public interest.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Addressing criticisms that the move lacked prior consultation and showed disrespect toward the Glatham Party, the People's Party leader clarified that Mr. Parit Wacharasindhu, list-MP and chief opposition whip, had consistently coordinated with all opposition parties, including maintaining regular updates with Glatham prior to making public announcements on Facebook.
The restructuring of the opposition whip and inter-party dynamics within the Thai House of Representatives highlight the delicate balance of legislative politics. As minor or swing parties navigate their positions between alignment with the ruling coalition and formal opposition duties, major opposition parties must carefully manage communication to maintain a united front for legislative oversight.
Furthermore, Natthaphong pointed out that the Glatham Party's stance regarding a potential no-confidence motion remains ambiguous, raising questions about whether they will vote to sustain or censure the administration. Meanwhile, he dismissed questions regarding recent photos of key political figures wearing personalized accessories, stating it was not a focal point of concern.
Source: Khaosod Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment