Democrat Party Slams Government Bureaucratic Reshuffles
Democrat deputy spokesperson criticizes the government for politically motivated bureaucratic appointments, citing poll data showing over 60% public distrust.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- The Democrat Party criticizes the current Thai government's civil service reshuffles.
- Cites an IFD poll showing over 60% of respondents believe appointments lack integrity.
- Compares the patronage system behaviors to Senate collusion scandals.
- Highlights controversial staff transfers by the National Office of Buddhism.
The Democrat Party has launched a sharp critique against the current administration regarding its handling of bureaucratic appointments, arguing that the government has failed to uphold its promise to parliament regarding good governance and meritocracy.
Nattakarn, deputy spokesperson for the Democrat Party, highlighted recent data from an IFD poll conducted earlier in the week. Surveying over 1,300 respondents across Thailand, the poll revealed that more than 60 percent of participants believe civil service appointments under the administration of Prime Minister and Interior Minister Anutin Charnvirakul are driven by politics, patronage networks, and financial influence rather than genuine merit.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
The survey results highlight growing public concern over high-level appointments, such as permanent secretaries with 8 to 10 years of service remaining. While legally permissible, critics argue these moves serve to consolidate political power while crushing the morale of dedicated civil servants seeking legitimate career advancement.
The Democrat Party also pointed to a recent lecture session led by party-list MP Chuan Leekpai at the Ministry of Education, where an overwhelming majority of attending civil servants expressed strong disapproval of current personnel transfer practices.
Bureaucratic appointments in Thailand have historically served as a critical battleground for political influence. Utilizing patronage networks to fill key administrative posts often undermines institutional integrity, weakens policy continuity, and hampers effective public administration.
“If the government appoints incompetent individuals solely for political gains, the resulting damage will fall back on the administration itself. Such behavior is just as despicable as Senate collusion.”
Nattakarn, Democrat Party Deputy Spokesperson
Furthermore, the spokesperson addressed a controversial transfer involving an academic official from Kalasin to Yala province following an inspection by National Office of Buddhism executives, stressing that Thailand's southern border provinces require careful deployment of personnel based on true suitability rather than arbitrary decisions.
Source: Matichon Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment