Itim Testifies to Police Committee on Senate Rigging
Parit Wacharasindhu appeared before the House Committee on Police on Sept 3, 2026, raising concerns over its investigation focus.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
- Parit Wacharasindhu testified before the House Committee on Police regarding the Senate rigging case on Sept 3, 2026.
- He maintained his cooperation while questioning whether the committee is prioritizing leak finders over actual wrongdoers.
- He also cautioned the government regarding rumors of transferring the DSI chief.
At 09:40 AM on September 3, 2026, at the Sappaya-Sapasathan Thai Parliament Bangkok, MP Parit Wacharasindhu from the People's Party attended a meeting called by the House Committee on Police. The session aimed to review the public dissemination of documents related to Special Case Investigation Report 24/2568 concerning illegal association and related charges.
The meeting was chaired by Watcharapong Kuwijitsuwan, an MP for Saraburi province from the Bhumjaithai Party and chairman of the committee. Alongside Parit, other key figures invited to provide information included Yingcheep Atchanont, Director of iLaw, the Director-General of the Department of Special Investigation (DSI), and the Commander of the Crime Suppression Division.
Stock photo for illustration only, not from the actual event
Speaking to reporters prior to the hearing, Parit noted that the official invitation letter cited the dissemination of documents regarding the alleged Senate rigging case, with himself summoned as a distributor of the information. However, he questioned what specific documents were being referred to, stating clearly that he had never leaked or distributed any documents concerning the matter. Despite this, he emphasized his accountability as a parliamentarian and his full readiness to cooperate with all relevant parties.
Parliamentary committee investigations into leaked official documents in high-profile cases often highlight the political tensions surrounding investigative bodies. When opposition figures question whether panels are more focused on hunting whistleblowers or leakers rather than investigating the actual corruption allegations, it underscores ongoing debates regarding the checks and balances within legislative mechanisms.
Beyond the document leak inquiry, Parit also raised a critical warning directed at the government regarding recent reports about potentially replacing the current DSI chief. He cautioned that such a move could raise legal and ethical questions over whether it constitutes an improper transfer of a civil servant for political benefit.
Source: Khaosod Politics
Found something wrong in this article? Report an issue with this article
Comments
Leave a Comment